Overcome design resource challenges

Design smarter in compressed timelines

Accelerating project delivery requires planning discipline, precision, and speed. Eaton supports you in delivering comprehensive and coordinated designs - faster.

Shortened timelines are the new norm

Commercial projects are increasingly running on fast-track schedules, which compress the design and build phases. This overlap introduces technical risks:

Limiting time for design coordination or iteration
Changing scope and late-stage requirements
Increasing likelihood of change orders and rework during construction

Learn how to design smarter in compressed timelines by engaging our expert application engineers early in the process.

Connect today

Condensed schedules lead to engineering trade-offs

In accelerated commercial projects, overlapping design and build phases often pressures engineers to make decisions with partial information. This introduces technical risks that can jeopardize safety, system performance, and constructability. Expedited design is not merely a scheduling issue; it’s a technical liability. Eaton helps mitigate these risks with expert support, tools, and pre-engineered solutions that support faster, more accurate design without compromising compliance or quality.

Risk: Limited time for multidisciplinary communication and collaboration (e.g., with plumbing, electrical, HVAC) increases the chances of routing issues and spatial conflicts.
Impact: Undersized electrical rooms, conduit paths clashing with ductwork, or overlooked grounding/bonding provisions—leading to field modifications or costly redesigns.

spacer

Risk: Fast-track timelines may prevent accurate load calculations and coordination with design and mechanical teams.
Impact: This can result in undersized or oversized electrical equipment such as transformers, feeders and switchgear, resulting in inefficiencies, voltage drop issues, or future capacity limitations.

spacer

Risk: When design timelines are rushed, steps can be missed to mitigate the risks of arc flash, including arc flash hazard studies and protective device coordination.
Impact: This can lead to unsafe working conditions, non-compliant systems, and commission delays or AHJ inspections.

spacer

Risk: With aggressive timelines, engineers may use outdated specifications without checking current product specifications or project-specific constraint or changes.
Impact: This can result in delayed procurements, submittal rejections, or the need for last-minute substitutions that could increase costs and affect system integrity or lead time.

spacer

Risk: Partially complete or inconsistent designs across disciplines increase the number of change orders or RFIs in the construction phase.
Impact: These can lead to missing project timelines, undermining trust between stakeholders, and increasing overall project cost.

spacer

Risk: Engineers may be pressured to simplify designs or avoid specifying advanced solutions due to time constraints.
Impact: This limits the potential for optimizing energy use, enhancing system resilience, or incorporating emerging technologies such as microgrids, energy storage, EV charging and digital metering.

spacer