Defining branch line restraints

NFPA 13 goes on to define exactly how to comply with this “lesser degree” requirement, by listing five standard installation practices (1-5 below) that are generally accepted. This leaves the door open for what is defined as “other approved means” (option 6 below).**

1) Listed Sway Brace Assembly

2) Wraparound U-Hook satisfying the requirements of 9.3.5.5.11

3) No. 12, 440 lb. (200 kg) wire installed at least 45 degrees from the vertical plane and anchored on both sides of the pipe.

4) CPVC hangers utilizing two points of attachment

5) Hanger not less than 45 degrees from vertical installed within 6 in. (152 mm) of the vertical hanger arranged for restraint against upward movement, provided it is utilized such that l/r does not exceed 400, where the rod shall extend to the pipe or have a surge clip installed.

6) Other approved means 

**Source; NFPA 13 (2013) Sec 9.3.6.1

At a glance, the first five practices seem straight forward, but what about the sixth? What are “other approved means?”
UL provides some insight to Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) on how to evaluate “other approved means" UL’s “Outline of Investigation for Sway Brace Devices (UL 203A; rev 6 15 2011)” includes a section that addresses products that meet a lesser degree of performance than those that achieve a listing as a lateral or longitudinal sway brace fitting or structural attachment. This creates a new “sub-section” for UL listing called a “Restraint Device.” Typically, these products will have loads in the range of approximately 300 lbs. or a lower l/r than its UL listed Sway Brace counterparts. The L/R or Slenderness Ratio refers to the allowable length of a rigid brace member. Limitations on length are imposed due to compressive force that acts on the branch line restraint assembly. Loads are affected by the length of the brace member of the branch line restraint. Simply stated, the longer the brace member is, the lower the ability to sustain a load.

However, there is a proposed word of caution regarding UL listed restraint devices. They are stamped with the UL logo and are shown in the same file as manufacturer-approved “Sway Brace” products, but are not UL listed to perform the same function.

Generally, these UL listed “Restraint” products should not be used to brace main or cross main piping. They should only be used as branch line restraints as their listing indicates. Recent changes to the UL test procedure have resulted in many manufacturers having products there were previously listed as a “Sway Brace” to fall into the new category of “Restraint”. This can create a problem when contractors install products that were previously UL listed as a lateral brace, but now are only listed as a restraint. If these products are installed for a purpose for which they are not listed, it is the same as installing a non-listed product. AHJ should be aware of the latest UL listings during both the plan review and inspection processes.

There are two tests to determine when a product meets the “other approved means” criterion per NFPA 13 (2013) section 9.3.6.1.

A “Listed Restraint Assembly” is not one of the five prescribed methods for compliance within NFPA 13 (2013) 9.3.6.1. As noted in the test criteria below, the load requirements and deformation requirements are much more relaxed than those of a listed sway brace device. The load requirements are also much less stringent than those required for a listing as a hanger. Therefore, this UL listing as a restraint device does not comply with any of the options 1-5 of section 9.3.6.1. The listing as a restraint must fall under the (6) “other approved means” method in NFPA 13, which is open to interpretation by the local authority having jurisdiction. Calculations that show the load requirements of the system design (similar to “zone of influence” calculations used with sway braces) should be required. Along with this, the capacity of the listed restraint assembly must show the assembly is capable of performing the task it is installed to do – to restrain a length of branch line piping.

11.1   Restraint Devices shall withstand a minimum force of 300 pounds-force (1334 N) without a displacement of more than 1/2 inch (12.4 mm) in tension and compression when installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

11.2   Restraints Devices installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s installation instructions on the appropriate pipe are to be installed in a tension-compression test apparatus in a manner duplicating as closely as possible their intended field installation. Each assembly is then to be subjected to an increasing compressive load until a load of 300 pound-force (1334 N) or a greater force specified in the manufacturer’s installation instructions is applied for one minute, in a manner to evaluate the restraining feature and the displacement measures. The load is then applied in tension and the displacement measured.

Factory Mutual Global (FM) has a different set of criteria for the testing of sway brace devices versus branch line restraints. Much more sophisticated than the UL 203A test, the FM 1950 test uses a shaker table to test cyclical loading of the products in a sway brace or BLR assembly. This is similar to the forces the products would experience during an actual earthquake. During testing, assemblies are actually installed and tested as an assembly configuration.

FM 1950 makes no distinction between a “sway brace device” and a “restraint device” in its testing procedure. There is no minimum load to achieve during testing. A product is simply tested, and an approved load is assigned. FM Global publishes load values applicable to a range of brace angles. The products intended by a manufacturer to be used as a restraint can be identified by much lower loads than those products intended for the bracing of sprinkler main piping. Or, in some cases the name of the product itself might be the only clue.

Throughout the industry, there is general consensus on the notion that branch line restraints are critical components of a high performance and NFPA 13-compliant seismic bracing system. Contractors have five methods specified in NFPA 13 on how to install a functional restraint assembly and a sixth option that opens the door to “other approved means.” UL has attempted to address the “other approved means” by developing a set of criteria that is measurably a “lesser degree of resisting loads than bracing” (NFPA 13; 2013, 9.3.6.1) and has allowed products to be listed in sway brace product files and bear the UL logo.

While this may cause some confusion for Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) on a product-specific listing, it is a good attempt to apply a specific set of test criteria to the NFPA 13 definition of a restraint. Similar to how requirements for sway bracing has evolved, it is likely that the requirements for Branch Line Restraints will continue to be redefined and expanded as NFPA 13 evolves through its revision cycles.

In the meantime, authorities need to understand exactly what is allowed by the five options in the current NFPA 13 standard as well as the UL testing and approval processes that manufacturers apply to their products. The manufacturers of products can only supply information about their products and the testing of their products. The manufacturer can offer that a product is listed or not, or approved or not, to perform certain functions as defined by those certifications. Contractors can design systems and have their submittals approved by the AHJ. After the systems are installed, contractors can only say that what they have installed is what was approved in the submittal or not.

If an installed product is not UL listed as a hanger or a sway brace, then it is the AHJ, not the manufacturer nor the contractor, who is responsible for defining whether or not the product is compliant with NFPA 13.

1. NFPA 13 Automatic Sprinkler Systems Handbook - 2010 edition - Jim Lake

2. NFPA 13 Automatic Sprinkler Systems Handbook - 2013 edition - Matthew J. Klaus

3. UL 203A Outline for the investigation of Sway Braces for Sprinkler System Piping - 2012 edition

4. FM Global - Approval Standard for Seismic Sway Braces for Automatic Sprinkler Systems Class Number 1950 - 2011